So, I was talking to a student yesterday who was completely panic-stricken because
they just realized their bedroom...
with their white-noise machine and their perfectly calibrated ergonomic chair...
is-is-is no longer an option.
Starting in August 2026, LSAC is pulling the plug.
Susan L.
Krinsky announced that almost all U.S.
and international test takers will take the multiple-choice section in physical
testing centers.
The era of the pajama LSAT is dead.
Wait.
Almost all?
Like, no more remote option at all unless you have some massive,
documented accommodation?
Exactly.
If you are a standard test-taker, you are going to a Prometric center.
LSAC is doing this to crack down on security issues, cheating,
and those awful, weeks-long score holds that have been driving everyone crazy.
But what this means is...
well, I call it the Prometric Tax.
The Prometric Tax.
Okay, explain that.
Is that like a physical fee, or...?
No, it's a cognitive tax.
A sensory tax.
You've been studying in a-a silent sanctuary.
Suddenly, you're in a room with twenty other nervous wrecks.
One guy is hyperventilating to your left, someone else is absolutely hammering on a
cheap, clacky membrane keyboard...
...and a proctor is pacing behind you, squeaking their rubber-soled shoes on cheap
linoleum.
It is a completely different mental game.
Oh, God, the keyboard hammering.
I remember when I took it, even with the-the heavy-duty plastic noise-reducing
earmuffs they give you...
you can still hear the vibration of people typing.
It's like this dull, rhythmic thudding.
It completely derails your focus if you aren't ready for it.
So, how do we prep for that?
We can't exactly rent out a Prometric center to practice.
No, but you have to stop treating LSAT prep as just a cognitive challenge.
It's nervous-system conditioning.
If you only practice in a quiet room, you are setting yourself up for a drop in
score on test day.
You need to actively seek out friction.
Go to a public library.
Sit near the high-traffic area.
Put on a YouTube track of "mechanical keyboard typing sounds" in your headphones
while you do a Logical Reasoning section.
You want to make your brain comfortable with distraction.
Yes!
I used to go to this local coffee shop that had the squeakiest espresso machine.
If I could find the flaw in a Flaw question while a barista was steaming oat milk
three feet away, I knew I could do it anywhere.
You have to train the panic out of your system.
You have to get used to the physical scratch paper, too.
No dual monitors, no digital highlighting on a massive screen...
just a single pencil, a booklet, and a stranger watching you.
Precisely.
The moment you step into that center, your adrenaline is going to spike.
If the first time you experience that sensory overload is when the timer starts
ticking on Section One...
you're-you're-you're already playing from behind.
Okay, but it's not just the room that's changing.
LSAC is also rolling out this new User Interface, right?
And I saw this update from them about answer elimination.
They basically admitted that moving from answer selection to answer elimination will
require an extra click.
Adrian, why on earth would they make it harder to cross out wrong answers?
It's a platform constraint.
The underlying architecture of the new system apparently can't support a simple,
single-click "radio-button" style cross-out.
So, instead of just hovering and clicking "eliminate," you now have to toggle a mode
or click a secondary button.
It's a mechanical mess.
An extra click.
That sounds tiny, but...
let's do the math.
There are, what, 75 or 76 multiple-choice questions on a scored test?
If you eliminate three wrong answers per question...
that's over two hundred extra clicks.
Two hundred times your hand has to move, aim, click, and toggle back.
That is a massive pacing drain on a test where seconds are literally life or death.
It is a significant physical speed bump.
And it's not just the time; it's the cognitive drag.
Every time you have to think about *how* to interact with the screen,
you are taking working memory away from analyzing the argument.
It breaks your reading rhythm.
Your hand-eye coordination gets micro-interrupted.
Ugh, that is so frustrating.
So what's the workaround?
How do we beat the interface?
Well, first, you have to practice with it.
LawHub is updating their prep tests to reflect the new UI, so don't use old
third-party platforms that don't match the new layout.
Second, they have added a few new features that are actually helpful if you know how
to use them.
There's a new "Reset Response" button.
It's basically a panic button.
If you've made a total mess of a question, highlighted three different things,
crossed out two answers, and you realize you're completely lost...
one click wipes the slate clean.
It resets the question so you can start fresh without manually undoing everything.
Oh, that's actually decent.
Like a mental reset.
What about the navigation bar?
Is that different?
It is.
It's expanded and segmented now, which makes it easier to see which questions you've
flagged or left blank at a glance.
But the real strategy here...
the ultimate way to beat the "extra-click tax"...
is to change how you think.
You have to move to a strict "pre-phrase first" mental model.
Pre-phrasing.
Right.
So, instead of looking at the five answers and clicking around,
crossing them off one by one like we used to do...
Yes.
You do the work in your head *before* your cursor even touches the answer choices.
Read the stimulus, find the argument, find the gap, and formulate the answer in your
own words.
If you know exactly what you are looking for, you don't need to eliminate four wrong
answers with eight extra clicks.
You just scan, find the match, click it once, and move on.
You bypass the UI tax entirely by being smarter, not faster.
I love that.
It turns a mechanical disadvantage into a reason to be a better logical thinker.
Alright, well...
get ready to click a lot more, and get some earplugs for practice.
Good luck out there.
Talk soon.