If you-you take two students who both missed, say, PrepTest 90,
Section 1, Question 14...
on paper, their-their spreadsheets look identical.
They both got a-a big red 'X' next to Question 14.
But if you actually dig into why...
uh, one of them has a critical reading comprehension problem,
while the other has an answer-choice elimination problem.
And a generic study log just-just completely fails to spot that difference.
Right, because the spreadsheet just says 'Question 14, wrong,
move on.'
But-but what you're saying is we need to know where the actual...
the actual point of failure was.
Did they-did they trip over the stimulus itself, or did they get tripped up by the
LSAT writers in the answer choices?
Exactly.
It's the-the distinction between what we call upstream errors and downstream errors.
An upstream error happens during the-the information-ingestion phase.
You are reading the stimulus, and you...
you misinterpret the raw data.
Maybe you misidentify the main conclusion, or you miss a-a quantifier shift--going
from, say, 'some' in the premises to 'most' in the conclusion.
Or-or my personal nemesis when I was studying...
misreading conditional trigger words like 'unless' or 'until.'
You map the-the formal logic completely backwards before you've even looked at the
question stem.
Exactly.
You've-you've poisoned the well.
Now, compare that to a downstream error.
This is where you understand the argument perfectly.
You see the gap, you-you know exactly what the flaw is...
but then you get down to the five answer choices and you-you get,
well, you get lost.
You fall for a 'shell game' choice that uses all the right keywords but swaps the
concepts, or you get scared off by a really strong verb in the correct necessary
assumption answer.
So upstream means you never even had a chance because your-your foundation was
cracked.
Downstream means you...
you had the right map, but you let the answer choices talk you out of the correct
path.
Yes.
In-in my litigation days, I used to see this all the time.
An upstream error is like a trial lawyer who-who sits there during a deposition and
completely misinterprets what the witness actually said on the stand.
They just-they misheard the testimony.
A downstream error is when the lawyer understands the testimony perfectly,
but when they stand up to do the cross-examination, they-they write a weak,
convoluted question that-that completely misses the mark.
The-the execution failed, not the comprehension.
Oof, yeah.
That-that deposition analogy really highlights it.
If you mishear the witness...
I mean, it doesn't matter how brilliant your-your cross-exam question is,
you're-you're fighting a ghost.
But if you write a bad question, you're just...
you're fumbling the delivery.
So how do we actually...
how does a student sitting at their desk find out where their pipeline is leaking?
Because when you're-you're looking at a completed section, it all just feels like a
big mess of-of confusion.
You have to run what I call the-the Cover-and-Compare Audit.
The next time you sit down with a question you missed, do not look at the correct
answer key yet.
Cover the five answer choices completely.
Force yourself to-to reconstruct the argument's skeleton in plain English.
Write down the-the premise, write down the conclusion, and explicitly write down
what you think the logical gap is.
Only then do you uncover the choices.
It's like...
it's like a water filtration plant, right?
If you-if you have dirty water at the end of the line, you don't just keep boiling
the municipal tap water and hope for the best.
That's-that's treating a downstream symptom.
You have to-to trace the pipe all the way back up the mountain to see if there's a-a
toxic spill at the reservoir.
If you cover the choices and realize you can't even summarize the argument...
well, your reservoir is contaminated.
You have an upstream issue.
That's a-a very vivid way to put it, yes.
And if you *can* write down the flaw perfectly without looking,
but you still picked option B during the timed test...
then we know the reservoir is clean, and the leak is downstream,
in your elimination strategy.
So, okay, when we're actually writing this down in our wrong answer journal...
what does the entry look like?
We can't just write 'I got tricked.'
No, we need a-a strict, six-point logging checklist.
First, you tag it: Upstream or Downstream.
Second, if it's upstream, you write down the exact word or phrase in the stimulus
that triggered the misread--did you miss the word 'only' or mistake 'some' for
'many'?
Third, if it's downstream, you identify the exact trap type you fell for--like 'too
strong' or 'unwarranted comparison.'
Wait, let me add the other three because this is-this is where the journal actually
becomes useful.
Fourth, you write down why the correct answer was attractive...
like, what was the psychological hook?
Fifth, why the correct answer--the one you probably crossed out early--was actually
correct, despite looking weird.
And sixth, what is the concrete rule you're taking away for next time.
Not 'be more careful,' but 'if I see "unless," I will instantly translate it to "if
not."'
Perfect.
That is how you turn a frustrating mistake into a repeatable blueprint.
When you-you stop asking 'what is the right answer?'
and start asking 'where exactly did my pipeline leak?', the-the anxiety of practice
tests just...
it melts away.
You're not bad at logic; you just have a leaky valve in your process that you
can-can easily patch before the next test.
Yeah.
It turns it from a-a moral failure of 'I'm not smart enough' into a simple...
plumbing problem.
Alright, let's-let's go fix some pipes.