I had a student last week who, uh, proudly told me they took four full length
practice tests in six days.
Four of them.
And they were utterly devastated, I mean, completely derailed because their score
actually dropped on the final one.
Oh, that makes my head hurt just hearing it.
It is the classic, you know, the cognitive illusion that taking the test is the same
thing as, as actually getting better at the test.
You are just measuring the temperature over and over.
Exactly.
I call it the, the Am I better yet, Doc, syndrome.
Taking three practice tests in five days and expecting a score increase is like
saying, Am I better yet, Doc, right after swallowing the first pill.
You are just repeatedly measuring the fever before the medicine has any actual time
to work in your brain.
Which just leads to massive, soul crushing fatigue.
But, okay, how does someone actually know if they are in a real,
genuine score plateau, or if it is just, like, normal day to day variance?
Because my score used to bounce around by five points all the time.
Right, variance is completely normal.
To identify a true, systemic plateau, we use the three three three diagnostic rule.
That is, a complete lack of score progress across at least three full length exams,
taken over a span of at least three weeks.
If you meet those criteria, you are plateaued.
If it has only been a week, or if you have only taken two tests,
you do not have enough data to panic yet.
Hmm.
That three three three rule makes so much sense because it,
it forces you to look at a trend instead of obsessing over one bad Tuesday.
You know, when I was studying, I hit this wall at one hundred and sixty five.
I, I was totally stuck.
I was taking test after test and getting nowhere, and out of pure frustration,
I just stopped.
I took four full days completely away from the LSAT.
No logical reasoning, no logic games, nothing.
And when I came back, the very next test I took, I scored a one hundred and seventy.
That is not a fluke, Nora.
There is actual neurobiology behind that.
Logical structures and complex reasoning habits do not solidify when your brain is
under high adrenaline testing pressure.
They, they actually crystallize during periods of rest and recovery.
It is like muscle growth.
You do not build muscle while you are lifting the weights.
You build it when you are sleeping and eating afterwards.
Right!
It was like my brain needed that empty space to actually build the pathways.
I had to stop the constant testing to let the concepts sink in.
But the problem is, when people do study, they fall into what I call the process to
performance trap.
They can be incredibly methodical and logical when they are doing untimed drills.
They find the conclusion, they find the premises, they look for the gap.
But the very second a thirty five minute timer starts, all of that structure just
flies out the window.
They panic and start relying entirely on vibes and rapid reading.
Oh, the vibes.
I know that feeling so well.
It is like, oh, this answer choice just feels right, or, uh,
this one sounds like something a lawyer would say.
It is total speed guessing because you are terrified of the clock.
And speed guessing is where scores go to die.
So, to break this, you have to do what we call an untimed second try audit.
It is a highly practical way to separate pacing errors from conceptual blind spots.
Before you grade your next practice test, do not look at the answer key.
Instead, hide the key, go back to every single question you flagged or missed,
and attempt them a second time with absolutely unlimited time.
Yes!
This is exactly what I did.
And this method, rather than taking back to back practice tests into oblivion,
helped me realize that I actually knew the material.
I just was not giving myself the permission to apply it under pressure.
Once I took the timer away, I realized, oh, I actually can solve this.
Speed naturally follows true understanding, not the other way around.
Right.
If you cannot get it right with unlimited time, you have a conceptual problem.
If you can get it right untimed, but miss it under pressure,
then it is a pacing and strategy problem.
And the best tool for pacing is having a highly customized,
personal skip list before you even sit down for the exam.
We call it the skip and succeed rule.
Wait, tell me more about that.
Like, what was on your skip list?
Well, for instance, immediately bypassing any parallel reasoning question with a
dense stimulus that appears after question fifteen.
Those questions are notorious time vortexes.
If you get sucked into one, you can easily spend five minutes on a single point,
which completely starves you of time for three easier questions at the end of the
section.
Oh, absolutely.
I used to get so stubborn.
I would think, no, I have already spent two minutes on this,
I have to finish it.
But the math of completion versus accuracy just does not support that.
Think about it.
If you rush through twenty six questions just to finish the section,
but you miss half of them because you are rushing, you only get thirteen points.
But if you calmly, methodically attempt only twenty questions with high accuracy,
and let us say you get eighteen of those right, plus you guess on the remaining six
and get maybe one or two of those by pure luck, you are looking at twenty points.
That is a massive score increase just by doing less, but doing it better.
It is pure arithmetic.
Accuracy always beats completion on this test.
If you want to break your plateau, you have to stop chasing the clock and start
chasing the process.
Take a breath, put the timer away for a bit, and stop taking tests into oblivion.
Honestly, that is the best advice anyone can take.
Alright, I think that is a perfect place to stop.
Good chatting, Adrian.
Talk soon, Nora.