1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:02,540 Here is a confession from the test-writer. 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:08,060 On most questions, the trap answer gets built before the right one. 3 00:00:08,820 --> 00:00:13,890 They decide which wrong choice you will reach for, and then they polish it until it 4 00:00:13,940 --> 00:00:14,460 gleams. 5 00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:19,900 So picture the choice that sounds the most decisive, the one that reads like a 6 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:20,960 closing argument. 7 00:00:21,730 --> 00:00:24,090 That is usually the one they planted for you. 8 00:00:25,385 --> 00:00:29,245 So the answer that sounds strongest is the one I should trust least? 9 00:00:29,785 --> 00:00:33,315 That is the exact opposite of how I read choices for my first month. 10 00:00:35,173 --> 00:00:35,174 It is. 11 00:00:35,203 --> 00:00:38,593 And by the end of this episode you will know the mechanism behind that, 12 00:00:38,933 --> 00:00:42,543 and you will have a checklist that catches it every time. 13 00:00:42,583 --> 00:00:44,292 But first, a quick callback. 14 00:00:45,290 --> 00:00:48,290 Back in Episode 1 we built the argument skeleton. 15 00:00:49,030 --> 00:00:50,530 Quick question, no peeking. 16 00:00:51,290 --> 00:00:52,470 What are the three pieces? 17 00:00:53,467 --> 00:00:58,007 Conclusion, premises, and the unstated assumption. 18 00:00:58,976 --> 00:01:03,027 The assumption is the bridge across the gap between the support and the claim. 19 00:01:04,087 --> 00:01:07,907 Hold onto that gap, because it is the engine for everything today. 20 00:01:08,967 --> 00:01:10,547 Here is the key point. 21 00:01:10,647 --> 00:01:14,807 Almost every wrong answer fails in one of two ways. 22 00:01:14,867 --> 00:01:17,887 It either ignores the gap, or it mis-states the bridge. 23 00:01:18,687 --> 00:01:19,707 That is the whole game. 24 00:01:20,627 --> 00:01:22,047 Today is not new theory. 25 00:01:22,387 --> 00:01:23,167 It is tactics. 26 00:01:23,987 --> 00:01:27,687 These wrong-answer shapes recur in every question type we covered, 27 00:01:28,007 --> 00:01:31,967 Episodes 2 through 10, so one move pays off everywhere. 28 00:01:33,006 --> 00:01:36,016 So one objective, and it is measurable. 29 00:01:36,116 --> 00:01:41,556 By the end, you will run a five-item trap checklist on a choice and kill a wrong 30 00:01:41,636 --> 00:01:46,236 answer in about ten seconds, naming exactly why. 31 00:01:46,276 --> 00:01:47,896 Three moves to get there. 32 00:01:47,956 --> 00:01:51,276 Move one, prephrase before you read the choices. 33 00:01:52,076 --> 00:01:54,496 Move two, the trap checklist itself. 34 00:01:55,376 --> 00:01:59,776 Move three, pacing, when to fight a question and when to walk away. 35 00:02:00,349 --> 00:02:00,958 Move one. 36 00:02:01,518 --> 00:02:02,078 Prephrase. 37 00:02:02,758 --> 00:02:03,308 Picture this. 38 00:02:04,078 --> 00:02:08,697 You finish the stimulus and the question stem, and before your eyes drop to choice 39 00:02:08,878 --> 00:02:14,248 A, you say out loud, in your own words, what the right answer has to do. 40 00:02:15,078 --> 00:02:16,298 Not the words it will use. 41 00:02:16,878 --> 00:02:18,438 The job it has to perform. 42 00:02:19,164 --> 00:02:23,783 Give me a concrete one, because in the abstract this sounds like extra work I do not 43 00:02:23,833 --> 00:02:24,283 have time for. 44 00:02:25,054 --> 00:02:26,574 Picture this argument. 45 00:02:26,674 --> 00:02:31,394 A new bus route will cut Maria's commute, because it skips three slow stoplights. 46 00:02:32,194 --> 00:02:34,194 The question asks what most strengthens it. 47 00:02:35,114 --> 00:02:37,254 Prephrase before reading a single choice. 48 00:02:38,054 --> 00:02:42,314 The answer needs to connect skipping those lights to actually arriving faster. 49 00:02:43,154 --> 00:02:44,914 That is the job. 50 00:02:44,994 --> 00:02:46,074 Now the choices arrive. 51 00:02:47,054 --> 00:02:48,694 One says the bus is painted blue. 52 00:02:49,554 --> 00:02:50,594 True, maybe. 53 00:02:51,323 --> 00:02:54,574 But it is dead on arrival, because you already hold the job, 54 00:02:55,074 --> 00:02:56,624 and a paint color does no work. 55 00:02:57,663 --> 00:03:01,584 So the prephrase is less a prediction and more a filter I walk in holding. 56 00:03:02,163 --> 00:03:06,543 The painted-blue line would have tempted me cold, but with a target in hand it just 57 00:03:06,554 --> 00:03:07,214 bounces off. 58 00:03:08,185 --> 00:03:08,755 That is the value. 59 00:03:09,365 --> 00:03:13,265 A prephrased reader walks in with a target and is far harder to bait. 60 00:03:14,125 --> 00:03:15,465 PowerScore puts it bluntly. 61 00:03:16,155 --> 00:03:18,955 Do not read the answer choices until you prephrase. 62 00:03:19,795 --> 00:03:23,455 But here is the crucial caveat, and it is where students hurt themselves. 63 00:03:24,355 --> 00:03:25,735 Hold the prephrase loosely. 64 00:03:26,395 --> 00:03:28,495 It is a compass, not the destination. 65 00:03:29,343 --> 00:03:35,473 Meaning if no choice matches my exact wording, I do not just panic and assume I 66 00:03:35,563 --> 00:03:36,113 misread? 67 00:03:37,059 --> 00:03:40,649 You drop it and judge the choices on their merits against the stimulus. 68 00:03:41,249 --> 00:03:45,899 On Strengthen, Weaken, and especially Parallel Reasoning, the credited answer is 69 00:03:45,969 --> 00:03:49,709 often phrased in a way you never would have predicted word for word. 70 00:03:49,769 --> 00:03:54,089 If you marry your exact phrasing, the prephrase becomes its own trap. 71 00:03:54,149 --> 00:03:56,908 It predicts the job, not the script. 72 00:03:57,086 --> 00:03:58,456 Move two, the heart of it. 73 00:03:58,936 --> 00:04:00,416 Five recurring trap patterns. 74 00:04:01,016 --> 00:04:04,416 I will name each, give you the one-line tell, and tie it to the gap. 75 00:04:05,096 --> 00:04:06,016 One quick warning first. 76 00:04:06,406 --> 00:04:08,736 These labels are ours, a working taxonomy. 77 00:04:09,316 --> 00:04:12,136 Different prep books name them differently, so learn the shape, 78 00:04:12,496 --> 00:04:13,046 not the word. 79 00:04:13,856 --> 00:04:15,266 Number one, out of scope. 80 00:04:15,856 --> 00:04:16,696 The tell. 81 00:04:16,736 --> 00:04:19,995 It raises a new issue the argument never touched. 82 00:04:20,521 --> 00:04:22,870 That is the oat-milk one you used in practice, right? 83 00:04:23,505 --> 00:04:23,855 It is. 84 00:04:24,545 --> 00:04:29,245 Picture a cafe arguing it should add oat milk because regulars keep asking for it. 85 00:04:29,255 --> 00:04:32,845 A trap choice talks about the cafe's parking situation. 86 00:04:32,905 --> 00:04:36,825 Parking might be a real problem, but it never touches the oat-milk reasoning. 87 00:04:37,505 --> 00:04:39,925 Out of scope ignores the gap entirely. 88 00:04:40,785 --> 00:04:43,285 Number two, extreme, or too strong. 89 00:04:43,825 --> 00:04:44,165 The tell. 90 00:04:44,785 --> 00:04:45,584 Absolute words. 91 00:04:46,185 --> 00:04:51,835 All, never, must, only, always, cannot, impossible. 92 00:04:52,461 --> 00:04:56,801 Okay, let me actually commit to a wrong answer here so you can fix me. 93 00:04:57,441 --> 00:05:02,260 Take the breakfast argument, the one that says eating breakfast probably helps most 94 00:05:02,341 --> 00:05:03,021 kids focus. 95 00:05:03,701 --> 00:05:07,641 The choice that says no child can concentrate without breakfast, 96 00:05:08,421 --> 00:05:09,501 I would pick that as correct. 97 00:05:10,221 --> 00:05:11,161 My reasoning. 98 00:05:11,201 --> 00:05:14,841 It is the strongest statement on the table, it covers every kid, 99 00:05:15,081 --> 00:05:19,291 no exceptions, so it feels like the safest, most complete answer. 100 00:05:19,921 --> 00:05:21,261 Decisive sounds right. 101 00:05:22,232 --> 00:05:26,441 And that pick costs you the question, so listen to the mechanism. 102 00:05:26,990 --> 00:05:29,601 The stimulus said probably and most. 103 00:05:30,171 --> 00:05:33,901 The choice leapt to no child and cannot. 104 00:05:33,961 --> 00:05:37,641 A correct answer can never claim more than the support allows, 105 00:05:37,661 --> 00:05:39,241 and the support here is hedged. 106 00:05:39,921 --> 00:05:43,981 So the very thing that made it feel safe, the no-exceptions strength, 107 00:05:44,521 --> 00:05:48,281 is what walks it off a cliff the premises do not back. 108 00:05:48,321 --> 00:05:50,861 Decisive is the bait, not the badge. 109 00:05:51,510 --> 00:05:55,010 So I should just eliminate anything with the word never or all? 110 00:05:56,059 --> 00:05:56,168 No. 111 00:05:56,658 --> 00:06:01,538 And this matters, because that overcorrection is itself the extreme error this 112 00:06:01,568 --> 00:06:02,578 episode warns about. 113 00:06:03,468 --> 00:06:08,048 Strong words are a red flag to scrutinize, not an automatic disqualifier. 114 00:06:08,808 --> 00:06:13,028 If the argument's logic requires strength, say a Sufficient Assumption answer, 115 00:06:13,488 --> 00:06:17,438 or the stimulus literally says every, then strong is correct. 116 00:06:18,158 --> 00:06:21,628 Match the strength of the answer to the strength the argument needs. 117 00:06:22,828 --> 00:06:24,608 Number three, half-right. 118 00:06:25,328 --> 00:06:25,698 The tell. 119 00:06:26,528 --> 00:06:28,948 One clause correct, one clause wrong. 120 00:06:29,619 --> 00:06:30,099 Picture this. 121 00:06:30,729 --> 00:06:34,319 The premises say every member of the book club has read the new novel, 122 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:36,559 and Dana is in the book club. 123 00:06:37,299 --> 00:06:39,379 The question asks what must be true. 124 00:06:40,089 --> 00:06:44,119 A trap choice says Dana has read the novel and recommended it to a friend. 125 00:06:44,919 --> 00:06:46,559 Pause and try this one before I answer. 126 00:06:47,219 --> 00:06:48,249 Is that choice safe? 127 00:06:49,111 --> 00:06:53,280 First half is forced, Dana definitely read it, so yes. 128 00:06:54,260 --> 00:06:54,400 No. 129 00:06:54,440 --> 00:06:54,640 Wait. 130 00:06:55,340 --> 00:06:56,530 Recommended it to a friend? 131 00:06:57,720 --> 00:06:58,900 Nothing in there says that. 132 00:06:59,530 --> 00:07:01,200 The second clause is invented. 133 00:07:02,250 --> 00:07:04,119 And that is the kill. 134 00:07:04,419 --> 00:07:09,319 Because the whole answer must be defensible, a single invented clause sinks it. 135 00:07:10,039 --> 00:07:14,249 Half-right is lethal because the test deliberately puts the correct-sounding part 136 00:07:14,279 --> 00:07:17,539 first, so you confirm the opening and stop. 137 00:07:17,579 --> 00:07:19,919 The defense is simple and non-negotiable. 138 00:07:20,479 --> 00:07:23,799 Read every word of every choice, every time. 139 00:07:24,899 --> 00:07:26,539 Number four, reversed. 140 00:07:27,199 --> 00:07:27,679 The tell. 141 00:07:28,139 --> 00:07:32,009 It does the opposite of the task, or it flips a conditional. 142 00:07:32,517 --> 00:07:33,866 Two flavors there, then. 143 00:07:34,166 --> 00:07:36,396 Opposite of the task, and flipped arrow. 144 00:07:37,638 --> 00:07:37,638 Right. 145 00:07:37,648 --> 00:07:39,208 Opposite of the task is sneaky. 146 00:07:39,688 --> 00:07:42,428 You are asked to weaken, and the choice strengthens. 147 00:07:43,088 --> 00:07:45,918 Under time pressure a relevant-sounding choice feels right, 148 00:07:46,228 --> 00:07:48,228 and you miss that it pushes the wrong direction. 149 00:07:49,097 --> 00:07:50,328 The flipped-arrow flavor. 150 00:07:51,008 --> 00:07:55,838 From if it rains, the picnic is cancelled, a trap says the picnic was cancelled, 151 00:07:56,068 --> 00:07:57,868 so it must have rained. 152 00:07:57,928 --> 00:08:00,828 That affirms the necessary condition and reverses the arrow. 153 00:08:01,528 --> 00:08:03,648 The picnic could be cancelled for a dozen reasons. 154 00:08:04,268 --> 00:08:06,088 Looks parallel, is invalid. 155 00:08:07,468 --> 00:08:10,048 Number five, true but irrelevant. 156 00:08:10,808 --> 00:08:11,688 The tell. 157 00:08:11,748 --> 00:08:14,308 It is true, but it does not move the argument. 158 00:08:15,007 --> 00:08:17,487 Honestly, how is that different from out of scope? 159 00:08:17,907 --> 00:08:19,117 They both feel like noise to me. 160 00:08:19,805 --> 00:08:22,645 Good push, and the honest answer is they overlap. 161 00:08:23,165 --> 00:08:25,445 Do not treat the five as mutually exclusive. 162 00:08:26,185 --> 00:08:28,345 Out of scope brings in a brand-new issue. 163 00:08:28,905 --> 00:08:32,895 True-but-irrelevant stays on topic, can even repeat a term from the stimulus, 164 00:08:33,225 --> 00:08:34,944 but has no effect on the logic. 165 00:08:35,705 --> 00:08:38,084 The blue-paint bus fact is the clean case. 166 00:08:38,685 --> 00:08:40,664 On topic, true, inert. 167 00:08:41,705 --> 00:08:45,105 These five are a recognition tool, not a filing cabinet. 168 00:08:45,245 --> 00:08:47,405 A single bad choice can fit two of them. 169 00:08:47,445 --> 00:08:50,485 The point is you flinch, not that you label it perfectly. 170 00:08:51,372 --> 00:08:53,861 Now, how do you run the checklist fast? 171 00:08:54,521 --> 00:08:55,081 Two habits. 172 00:08:55,701 --> 00:08:57,281 First, the weakest word. 173 00:08:57,901 --> 00:09:02,641 A correct answer must be one hundred percent defensible, so you attack the single 174 00:09:02,741 --> 00:09:07,681 most extreme or unsupported word in each choice, not the overall vibe. 175 00:09:08,361 --> 00:09:10,761 One bad word kills the whole thing. 176 00:09:11,331 --> 00:09:15,771 That one move unifies extreme, half-right, and the shell game, 177 00:09:16,081 --> 00:09:20,611 where a choice quietly swaps in a slightly different concept than the stimulus used. 178 00:09:21,433 --> 00:09:22,262 And the second habit? 179 00:09:22,955 --> 00:09:24,724 Contenders versus Losers. 180 00:09:25,464 --> 00:09:29,144 First pass, go through all five and sort each one fast. 181 00:09:29,744 --> 00:09:31,504 Could-work, or clearly-out. 182 00:09:32,164 --> 00:09:33,084 Do not agonize. 183 00:09:33,904 --> 00:09:38,044 Second pass, take only the survivors and compare them head to head against the 184 00:09:38,084 --> 00:09:38,504 stimulus. 185 00:09:39,344 --> 00:09:43,064 Here is the cardinal rule, and it is counterintuitive. 186 00:09:43,124 --> 00:09:46,844 If you cannot say why a choice is wrong, you keep it. 187 00:09:47,524 --> 00:09:48,504 Do not eliminate it. 188 00:09:49,695 --> 00:09:51,665 That is backwards from instinct. 189 00:09:51,745 --> 00:09:54,225 I want to cut the one that feels off and move on. 190 00:09:55,376 --> 00:09:58,915 And feels-off elimination is how you throw out correct answers, 191 00:09:59,365 --> 00:10:02,665 because the right answer is sometimes phrased to feel off. 192 00:10:03,425 --> 00:10:05,865 Elimination is about proof, not gut. 193 00:10:06,685 --> 00:10:08,615 Name the flaw or keep the contender. 194 00:10:09,525 --> 00:10:14,385 Let's run one faded, and before you solve it, do the thing we drill from Episode 5 195 00:10:14,465 --> 00:10:14,645 on. 196 00:10:15,385 --> 00:10:17,485 Name the question type and what it needs. 197 00:10:18,545 --> 00:10:23,365 A store claims its new loyalty app boosted sales because members spend more per 198 00:10:23,405 --> 00:10:24,345 visit. 199 00:10:24,355 --> 00:10:27,265 The stem asks what most strengthens. 200 00:10:27,275 --> 00:10:29,305 So, what type, and what is the job? 201 00:10:30,338 --> 00:10:30,947 Strengthen. 202 00:10:31,307 --> 00:10:36,047 And the job is to tie app membership to the spending bump, to back the idea that the 203 00:10:36,127 --> 00:10:38,907 app caused it, not just restate that members spend more. 204 00:10:40,018 --> 00:10:40,728 Good. 205 00:10:40,768 --> 00:10:42,228 That is the prephrase. 206 00:10:42,988 --> 00:10:48,568 Now a choice says members were already the bigger spenders before the app launched. 207 00:10:49,268 --> 00:10:50,548 Your turn, finish it. 208 00:10:51,108 --> 00:10:54,188 Contender or loser, and say why. 209 00:10:55,253 --> 00:10:55,254 Loser. 210 00:10:55,323 --> 00:10:57,223 Worse than a loser, actually. 211 00:10:57,243 --> 00:11:00,643 For a strengthen question it cuts the other way. 212 00:11:00,703 --> 00:11:05,273 If members already spent more before the app, the app might not be doing anything. 213 00:11:06,003 --> 00:11:08,963 That is the reversed flavor, opposite of the task. 214 00:11:09,443 --> 00:11:10,183 It weakens. 215 00:11:10,865 --> 00:11:14,294 And say why that step works, in one line. 216 00:11:15,163 --> 00:11:19,013 Because it offers an alternative cause for the spending, which attacks the exact 217 00:11:19,093 --> 00:11:21,772 link a strengthen answer is supposed to reinforce. 218 00:11:22,434 --> 00:11:24,134 Move three, timing. 219 00:11:24,884 --> 00:11:25,814 The numbers first. 220 00:11:26,714 --> 00:11:31,194 Each scored Logical Reasoning section is thirty-five minutes with roughly 221 00:11:31,254 --> 00:11:33,854 twenty-four to twenty-six questions. 222 00:11:33,934 --> 00:11:38,474 That is about eighty-five seconds per question on average, call it one point four 223 00:11:38,574 --> 00:11:38,894 minutes. 224 00:11:39,754 --> 00:11:40,894 And remember the structure. 225 00:11:41,774 --> 00:11:47,484 Two scored LR sections, plus Reading Comprehension, plus one unscored experimental 226 00:11:47,534 --> 00:11:47,874 section. 227 00:11:48,734 --> 00:11:51,714 Logic Games is gone as of August 2024. 228 00:11:52,314 --> 00:11:55,694 So Logical Reasoning is about two-thirds of your scored test. 229 00:11:56,434 --> 00:11:57,814 This skill compounds. 230 00:11:58,629 --> 00:12:02,189 So I just spend eighty-five seconds on each one and I am fine? 231 00:12:04,672 --> 00:12:06,102 That is the trap hiding inside the timing advice. 232 00:12:07,062 --> 00:12:10,982 Eighty-five seconds is an average, not a budget you spend evenly. 233 00:12:11,882 --> 00:12:14,602 The questions tend to get harder toward the back of the section. 234 00:12:15,442 --> 00:12:20,772 So the smart move is to run faster than average up front, about a minute on the easy 235 00:12:20,962 --> 00:12:26,222 early ones, to bank time for the brutal later ones, closer to two minutes each. 236 00:12:27,302 --> 00:12:28,582 Spend unequally. 237 00:12:29,342 --> 00:12:30,642 That is the whole skill. 238 00:12:31,573 --> 00:12:34,033 And when a question just will not crack? 239 00:12:36,053 --> 00:12:36,883 You skip, deliberately. 240 00:12:37,643 --> 00:12:40,503 Cap a question at about ninety seconds on the first pass. 241 00:12:40,963 --> 00:12:45,343 If you are stuck after that, cannot find the conclusion, cannot eliminate more than 242 00:12:45,463 --> 00:12:49,573 one choice, you make your best guess, flag it, and move on. 243 00:12:50,503 --> 00:12:53,563 Skip is a skill, not a failure. 244 00:12:53,603 --> 00:12:55,083 The math is unforgiving. 245 00:12:55,703 --> 00:13:00,803 Sink four minutes into one hard question and you silently lose two or three easy 246 00:13:00,883 --> 00:13:02,663 ones at the end you never even reach. 247 00:13:03,438 --> 00:13:05,218 Why guess now if I am coming back? 248 00:13:05,628 --> 00:13:08,098 Why not just leave it blank for the moment? 249 00:13:08,184 --> 00:13:10,753 Because skip never means leave empty. 250 00:13:11,253 --> 00:13:14,213 It means guess, flag, and come back. 251 00:13:14,973 --> 00:13:18,133 You bubble a guess immediately so that if you run out of time, 252 00:13:18,173 --> 00:13:20,133 the points are still in play. 253 00:13:20,173 --> 00:13:24,873 There is no penalty for wrong answers on this test, so a blank bubble is pure lost 254 00:13:24,893 --> 00:13:25,253 points. 255 00:13:26,063 --> 00:13:27,893 And the return pass has a bonus. 256 00:13:28,633 --> 00:13:32,993 Fresh eyes catch the careless misread, a missing not, a most, 257 00:13:33,013 --> 00:13:38,073 an except, the one word that flipped the whole question while you were grinding. 258 00:13:38,195 --> 00:13:41,445 Here is your compressed heuristic, the thing to carry out the door. 259 00:13:42,235 --> 00:13:45,415 Prephrase the job, then hunt the weakest word. 260 00:13:46,035 --> 00:13:46,975 Say it with me as a rhythm. 261 00:13:47,675 --> 00:13:50,635 Prephrase the job, hunt the weakest word. 262 00:13:51,232 --> 00:13:54,012 And the five tells, fast. 263 00:13:54,052 --> 00:13:59,612 Out of scope, extreme, half-right, reversed, true-but-irrelevant. 264 00:14:00,412 --> 00:14:06,412 New issue, absolute word, one bad clause, wrong direction, true but inert. 265 00:14:07,297 --> 00:14:08,646 That is the checklist. 266 00:14:09,246 --> 00:14:10,926 Now back to our cold open. 267 00:14:11,546 --> 00:14:15,996 Remember the answer that sounds the most decisive, the one built to be picked? 268 00:14:16,666 --> 00:14:22,046 Run it through the list and you will usually find it tripping extreme or half-right. 269 00:14:22,056 --> 00:14:24,466 The polish is the bait. 270 00:14:24,476 --> 00:14:28,776 The right answer is often the quieter, fully defensible one. 271 00:14:29,606 --> 00:14:32,596 Prephrase the job, hunt the weakest word. 272 00:14:33,437 --> 00:14:35,586 And two non-negotiables before I go. 273 00:14:36,186 --> 00:14:39,496 Never leave a bubble blank, because there is no guessing penalty, 274 00:14:40,086 --> 00:14:44,986 and actually practice skipping in timed sets so it is instinct, 275 00:14:45,046 --> 00:14:46,926 not a decision I make mid-panic. 276 00:14:47,873 --> 00:14:49,143 That second one matters. 277 00:14:49,783 --> 00:14:51,653 This episode is the recall layer. 278 00:14:52,243 --> 00:14:55,803 The time-management muscle only builds in the timed question bank, 279 00:14:56,343 --> 00:15:01,663 so go run one timed set tonight and force yourself to flag and skip at least two 280 00:15:01,783 --> 00:15:03,063 questions on purpose. 281 00:15:04,043 --> 00:15:06,783 Next time, Episode 12, the finale. 282 00:15:07,303 --> 00:15:10,803 The full Logical Reasoning attack plan, where the skeleton, 283 00:15:11,183 --> 00:15:16,273 every question type, and today's traps and timing all fold into one routine you run 284 00:15:16,303 --> 00:15:17,883 on every single question.